Decide Greg Mathis is aware of a factor or two about sentences, judgements and all issues associated to that bench. The favored tv arbitrator with a typical sense model, is talking out concerning the fallout from Sean “Diddy” Combs’ federal courtroom verdict, urging that the music mogul be handled pretty beneath the legislation as sentencing approaches.

Whereas enjoying a spherical at Mountain Gate Golf Course on Wednesday, Mathis addressed reporters and shared his ideas on the case’s final result. He acknowledged the general public strain surrounding Diddy’s identify however made it clear that equal justice should apply, no matter fame. “He ought to be sentenced like some other particular person discovered responsible of comparable prices,” Mathis stated.

Diddy was not convicted on probably the most severe prices, which included federal racketeering and intercourse trafficking. Decide Mathis stated he was not satisfied these prices had been acceptable to start with. “I by no means believed the federal racketeering cost match the details,” he defined. As for the trafficking allegations, Mathis added that these counts appeared “questionable” primarily based on the proof that surfaced in the course of the trial.

Whereas Diddy’s authorized scenario has stirred large media consideration and public debate, Mathis emphasised that first-time offenders are usually given extra leniency in sentencing, and that customary ought to apply throughout the board. His feedback replicate a perception within the significance of consistency within the justice system, even when the particular person in query is a cultural icon.