GloRilla is firing again at a copyright lawsuit that accuses her of stealing lyrics for her observe By no means Discover. The Memphis rapper, alongside UMG Recordings, Warner Chappell Music, and BMG Rights Administration, has requested a federal court docket in Louisiana to throw out the case, arguing that the phrase “no BBL” is just too brief and too widespread to qualify for authorized safety.
The criticism was filed by Natalie Henderson, also referred to as Slimdabodylast, who factors to her tune All Pure because the supply of the dispute. Henderson claims her observe, which options the lyric “all naturale, no BBL,” gained momentum on socials in early 2024 for spotlighting pure our bodies. She argues that GloRilla’s line, “Pure, no BBL, however I’m nonetheless gon’ give them hell,” mirrors her work and that the rapper has profited from it.
GloRilla’s attorneys are pushing again on a number of factors. First, they argue Henderson has not proven that GloRilla ever had entry to her tune. Merely importing a observe on-line, they be aware, doesn’t show publicity. In most copyright disputes, plaintiffs should exhibit widespread distribution or business success, which they are saying Henderson’s tune lacks.
Additionally they stress that the lyrics themselves aren’t considerably related. Henderson’s phrase seems a number of occasions as a hook, whereas GloRilla’s model is used as soon as in a distinct lyrical context and with its personal rhyme. Her authorized workforce provides that phrases like “give them hell” are widespread expressions in music and don’t quantity to copying.
Past that, the protection challenges Henderson’s try to pursue each statutory and precise damages, saying she has not offered proof of infringement robust sufficient to justify monetary restoration or an injunction. They additional argue that praising pure our bodies has develop into a frequent theme in up to date music and can’t be claimed as authentic.
For now, the court docket will resolve whether or not Henderson’s claims are robust sufficient to maneuver ahead or if GloRilla’s movement to dismiss will shut the case earlier than it ever reaches trial.
