Diddy might see his high-profile federal trial unravel dramatically as authorized analyst Dr. Phil McGraw warned the prosecution’s case—constructed on emotionally charged testimony and sweeping allegations—might not meet the authorized threshold required for conviction.
Now, 4 weeks into proceedings, the music mogul is going through critical federal prices, together with racketeering, intercourse trafficking and transporting people for prostitution.
Nevertheless, in accordance with Dr. Phil, the federal government’s case could also be legally flimsy regardless of its emotional weight.
“They might have thought their proof towards Combs was so emotionally highly effective, so sensational {that a} jury could be so offended that they’d convict Combs no matter whether or not the details exactly line up with the fees,” Dr. Phil informed The Each day Mail.
Dr. Phil believed the protection would ask for a directed verdict, often known as a judgment as a matter of legislation, which might permit U.S. District Decide Arun Subramanian to dismiss the case earlier than it reaches the jury if he determines the prosecution hasn’t offered sufficient proof to help a conviction.
Probably the most scrutinized testimony got here from Cassie Ventura, Diddy’s former associate, who took the stand on Tuesday and Wednesday (Might 13–14).
Her account painted a disturbing image of abuse and coercion, however Dr. Phil argued that her testimony, whereas emotionally impactful, might not fulfill the authorized requirements for the crimes charged.
“None of that’s unlawful in and of itself,” Dr. Phil argued.
The prosecution’s reliance on Ventura as a central witness has raised eyebrows, particularly given her sophisticated private historical past with Diddy. Dr. Phil stated the authorized bar for proving a RICO conspiracy or intercourse trafficking is much increased than merely presenting disturbing anecdotes.
“The prosecution might have overcharged this case—by sipping on what I name ‘candy poison,’” Dr. Phil stated.
Dr. Phil likened the state of affairs to the notorious O.J. Simpson trial, highlighting the disparity between public notion and authorized proof.
Authorized specialists say the protection is prone to file a movement for a directed verdict within the coming days, doubtlessly ending the trial earlier than the jury even deliberates.
If granted, it could be a significant blow to the federal government’s case and a shocking flip in some of the carefully watched superstar trials in years.
The trial stays ongoing as of Tuesday (June 10).
