X/@TeamKhabib
Khabib Nurmagomedov, the retired UFC champion, has profited from the NFT Papakha hats in addition to the unique public sale carried out through Telegram, the place his entire assortment has been bought. He all the time needed to introduce his Dagestani tradition to the world by means of digital artwork, and whereas a number of the followers help his transfer by calling it the “cultural significance of the digital objects,” others criticize him for being broke simply and “in want” of cash.
Commercial
The ending of the public sale got here with the announcement from the ex-fighter that the whole was all bought. In a video showcasing the objects, Khabib Nurmagomedov, talked about the importance of the cultural headdress. “In Dagestan this head has that means,” he declared. “It’s Papacha. It signifies your origin, It’s about the Aristocracy, Self-discipline. The rules my father instilled in me.” He known as the digital counterpart a “present of value” which the house owners may give to their buddies and kinfolk, a recent technique of passing on customs by means of digital collectibles on the Ton blockchain.
Social media was extremely polarized. A person was very simple in labeling Khabib Nurmagomedov as a “disgusting pretend muslim scammer.” One other person expressed related views and added, “Maaan, even essentially the most trustworthy individual will get corrupted by quick haram money grabs.” This remark voiced the sentiments of some who thought of themselves deceived by the net public sale and noticed it as a watershed second within the morally upright picture Khabib had been build up.
One of many main factors of the dispute was the product itself. A person inquired concerning the basic worth, ‘had been these papakhas merely digital property?’ This ambiguity was cleared up by one other person who stated, ‘Based on studies, Khabib’s Papakha public sale on Telegram was for digital collectibles solely, issued as NFTs on the TON community. There’s no point out of bodily objects or transport within the public sale.’ This rationalization served as a place to begin for the criticism, with one individual asserting, ‘digital Parakas NFT is nothing however a digital sticker. It has no value.’
When an increasing number of individuals joined the argument with the intention to help the concept, the dialogue received extra mental. A person named Magomed Kurbaitaev offered an in depth analogy between the Telegram items and an already current digital tradition as his backup. ‘Alright, lots of people nonetheless don’t get Telegram items, so let me put it on the market in plain phrases,’ he stated. He likened the gifting of the digital Persians on Russian social networks and right now’s eventualities like Fortnite outfits and CS:GO skins. ‘You aren’t shopping for the animation,’ he claimed. ‘You might be paying for its that means Shortage + demand + id = worth.’
Nonetheless, this argument didn’t reduce the critics’ considerations concerning the morality of the matter. One remark maintained, ‘As a result of a lot of them usually are not totally conscious of what they’re shopping for. They merely purchase it as a result of Khabib says it’s vital, when in truth they’re simply keys shopping for a particular image of a hat on the pc. I don’t assume what Khabib and Ali are doing is a full-blown rip-off, however it’s sleazy.’ This remark really encapsulates the entire concern, stating that the priority will not be a lot concerning the product as it’s concerning the notion of benefiting from the followers’ confidence by promoting them a digital asset whose intrinsic worth is questionable.
Commercial
That public sale’s success has demonstrated as soon as once more Khabib Nurmagomedov’s model energy and {that a} small however loyal a part of his viewers is able to pay for and to proceed supporting his digital tradition imaginative and prescient. The very robust resistance, nonetheless, demonstrates that the break up is obvious. For each fanatic who regards a blockchain-based creative creation as cultural heritage piece worthy there’s one other one who sees a devalued character of his/her cherished idol. The merchandise has modified possession, but the difficulty on the place to attract the road dividing cultural trade from business exploitation is being debated. This case has proven the struggles confronted by public figures to find the stability between custom and trendy digital financial system.
