Cameras captured a collection of candid reactions from the actress in the course of the 2026 ceremony, moments that shortly unfold on-line and divided viewers. 

Whereas some questioned her composure after dropping in two main classes, others praised her honesty in an trade typically criticized for performative reactions. 

By the top of the night time, Seyfried’s loss had remodeled into one of the vital talked-about moments of the present.

Amanda Seyfried raised eyebrows when she misplaced the award for Finest Efficiency by an Actress in a Movement Image to Rose Byrne. 

In a viral clip, the 40-year-old briefly grimaced earlier than forcing a smile, standing, clapping, and applauding the winner. 

The actress had been nominated for “The Testomony of Ann Lee,” whereas Byrne’s efficiency in “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You” had already gained important momentum following its Sundance premiere. 

Byrne beforehand gained the Silver Bear for Finest Main Efficiency on the Berlin Movie Pageant and earned a Critics Alternative Award nomination, making her a robust contender going into the night time.

The depth surrounding Amanda Seyfried’s response was heightened by her awards historical past. Of the six nominees in her class, three had beforehand gained Golden Globes. 

Emma Stone took house trophies for “La La Land” in 2017 and “Poor Issues” in 2024. Jennifer Hudson gained Supporting Actress for Virtually Well-known again in 2001. 

Seyfried herself gained Finest Efficiency by an Actress in a Restricted Collection, Anthology Collection or Tv Movie in 2023 for “The Dropout.”

That background made the loss really feel heavier for some viewers, particularly given Seyfried’s previous success with the group. 

Later within the night, she confronted one other disappointment when she misplaced once more, having additionally been nominated for “Lengthy Shiny River.” 

The double loss fueled on-line sympathy and criticism alike, as followers debated whether or not expectations and strain performed a job in her seen reactions.

As reactions poured in, physique language professional Judi James provided a extra nuanced clarification of Seyfried’s conduct to the Every day Mail. 

In line with James, awards-season etiquette has shifted over time. 

“There are two contrasting methods to react to dropping out on an award when you already know you’re on split-screen,” the professional defined. 

She described the normal strategy as exaggerated pleasure, noting that some nominees seem “as if they’ve simply gained, with screams and open mouthed grins of pretend delight.”

James added that trendy celebrities more and more go for honesty or humor as an alternative of pressured enthusiasm. 

“Just lately there was a rising tendency to disclose or act out the extra trustworthy feelings of dropping as a sort of a joke although,” she stated. “Celebs will typically now present indicators of comedy annoyance or anger at dropping fairly than faux to be delighted.” 

In line with James, Seyfried’s expression match squarely inside that newer development.

James emphasised that Amanda Seyfried’s now-viral grimace appeared intentional fairly than resentful. 

“Amanda’s facial features right here suggests she was joking with the comedy grimace,” she stated. 

James identified that the “Imply Women” star didn’t put together a rehearsed “losers” smile, as an alternative trying down earlier than the winner was introduced, suggesting she had no intention of performing faux bravado.

Nonetheless, James acknowledged that the second mattered deeply to the actress. “She does look tense right here, exhibiting how necessary a second it was for her,” she continued. 

The professional recognized a refined bodily cue that exposed Seyfried’s disappointment, explaining that “the one actual ‘inform’ of getting discovered dropping laborious comes from a tough blink that she does because the winner’s identify is known as and she or he begins to clap.” 

Regardless of that, Seyfried shortly recovered, smiling and chatting as a part of what James described as her model of “good losers” face.