Toronto city councillors have directed the city solicitor to explore legal strategies to protect city-owned land at Billy Bishop Airport amid plans for a provincial takeover. On Wednesday, council approved a motion formally opposing any unilateral expropriation of city property by provincial or federal authorities.
Council Demands Inclusion in Waterfront Decisions
The motion also calls for involvement from council and Toronto residents in key decisions affecting the waterfront. The city currently holds a 20 per cent stake in the airport through a tripartite agreement with the federal government and the Toronto Port Authority.
Premier Doug Ford announced intentions to assume control of the city’s land share. His government aims to grant the airport a special designation, enabling it to circumvent municipal and provincial regulations to develop infrastructure for jet operations.
Councillors Voice Strong Opposition
Councillor Ausma Malik, who proposed the motion, described the provincial plan as “unacceptable.” She stated, “The province is telling us they don’t care what we have to say, they don’t care about collaboration, negotiation or the best outcomes, they don’t care what Torontonians have to say.” Malik emphasized, “We demand a seat at the table.”
Councillor Josh Matlow successfully amended the motion to require the city solicitor to deliver a reports late next month on “potential legal options to defend the City of Toronto’s interests” concerning city lands at Billy Bishop and the waterfront. Matlow questioned council, “If we don’t take a stand and look into every option that we have, what’s going to be the next announcement?”
Legal Challenges and Limitations
Experts indicate the city faces significant hurdles, as the matter falls under provincial jurisdiction. Should the city resist, the province could invoke special powers to seize control within six months, with courts determining compensation. The city solicitor plans to present findings when council reconvenes April 22-24.
Wider Concerns Over Jets and Development
Opposition to jet service at the downtown waterfront airport stems from longstanding worries about noise and environmental effects. Expansion could also jeopardize housing projects in the Port Lands, with thousands of units at risk.
Councillor Dianne Saxe remarked to reporters, “And that’s going to be ruined by making runway space for these jets that don’t belong there? It’s a terrible idea.” City staff noted that provincial plans remain undisclosed, leaving impacts uncertain.
Councillor Gord Perks highlighted a fundamental issue: “It’s about whether you believe that local governments have a say in local decision-making.”
Ford countered on Monday that certain councillors resist modernization. He argued airport growth would generate jobs, stimulate Ontario’s economy, and alleviate congestion at Pearson International Airport.
