Years after retired NBA star Charles Oakley sued New York Knicks proprietor James Dolan for having safety at Madison Sq. Backyard forcibly take away him from the world, the courtroom case has taken a brand new flip. Final Friday (Oct. 31), a courtroom ordered Oakley to cough up some massive cash for the 2017 incident.
In line with Complicated, U.S. Justice of the Peace Choose Robyn F. Tarnofsky dominated that the previous Knicks energy ahead has to pay $642,000 to James Dolan for authorized charges to cowl the lawyer prices related to MSG’s effort to get well Oakley’s deleted textual content messages associated to the 2017 incident.
Who knew it prices a lot to get well deleted textual content messages?
Whereas $642,000 looks as if some huge cash merely for recovering deleted textual content messages, it’s lots lower than the $1.5 million that Dolan’s authorized staff initially requested for regarding the matter. So we guess it’s a “win” of types for Oak. The decide decreased the invoice after discovering the agency’s hourly charges and time entries didn’t match up with its unique request and landed on a complete of $642,337.
Whereas Charles Oakley initially sued James Dolan for the incident eight years in the past, issues didn’t precisely break his manner and have seemingly change into a headache for the person ever since.
Per Complicated:
The case was dismissed in 2021, however a federal appeals courtroom revived components of it in 2023, permitting particular claims to proceed. Whereas the underlying case continues, the price ruling represents a setback for Oakley.
MSG was granted the proper to hunt authorized charges in July after the courtroom discovered that Oakley didn’t protect textual content messages from the interval following the incident. MSG’s attorneys mentioned the method of trying to get well these messages accounted for greater than $1.3 million of their time.
Oakley’s lawyer, Valdi Licul, mentioned in a press release that the protection staff plans to attraction the ruling, including, “The courtroom denied most of MSG’s wildly inflated price request… we disagree that MSG is entitled to any restoration.”
Given James Dolan’s very deep pockets, we really feel this received’t end up too nicely for the beloved retired New York Knicks participant. Simply sayin’.
What do y’all take into consideration this newest ruling within the case of Charles Oakley vs. James Dolan? Truthful or foul? Tell us within the feedback part beneath.
