Sean “Diddy” Combs is getting one other chew on the apple … his attorneys can be in court docket at this time arguing to overturn his conviction on 2 federal counts of the Mann Act.

Diddy’s authorized workforce is asking Decide Arun Subramanian to vary Diddy’s Mann Act conviction to an acquittal or give him a brand new trial. Federal prosecutors are against each.

As you already know, the Mann Act prohibits the transportation of people throughout state strains for the needs of prostitution.

Diddy’s attorneys beforehand claimed he made no cash off prostitution and insisted the Mann Act is normally designed for going after individuals operating intercourse rings.

In addition they say Diddy by no means had intercourse with the male intercourse staff, and by no means straight organized for his or her transportation throughout state strains. His attorneys say Diddy was merely a voyeur and beginner pornographer who loved recording his ex-girlfriends having intercourse.

Federal prosecutors, nevertheless, have countered … Uncle Sam says there was loads of proof to assist the jury’s Mann Act convictions … arguing Diddy was the mastermind of each side of his notorious freak-offs.

The feds have additionally attacked the notion Diddy simply appreciated to look at, saying he “absolutely participated by directing the sexual conduct between escorts and victims and masturbating all through the sexual episode.”

What’s extra, prosecutors claimed Diddy’s argument that he was extra like a porn producer protected underneath the First Modification would not maintain water as a result of most of the freak-offs weren’t recorded — and for those that have been, Diddy usually did not give advance discover he’d be filming, and most of the members did not consent to the recordings.