Diddy was advised by a federal choose he should clarify why he needs to be allowed to put on civilian garments at his sentencing in October 2025.

Diddy has been ordered to clarify why he wants fancy threads as a substitute of jail-issued clothes when he seems in federal court docket for sentencing on October 3, 2025, after a choose rejected his earlier try and put on civilian garments for a separate listening to this week.

U.S. District Decide Arun Subramanian denied a movement from Diddy’s authorized group to permit him to put on non-prison apparel at his September 25 court docket look, saying the protection failed to offer a legitimate cause for the request.

The choose left the door open for the October sentencing however made it clear he expects a extra detailed clarification earlier than signing off.

Diddy’s attorneys submitted a scaled-back wardrobe request, asking the court docket to approve two button-down shirts, two pairs of pants, two sweaters and one pair of footwear with out laces.

That is far much less than what he was allowed throughout his prison trial earlier this yr, when he was permitted to put on as much as 5 gadgets of every sort to keep away from showing in jail apparel earlier than a jury.

The October listening to will decide Diddy’s sentence after he was convicted on two counts of transporting people throughout state traces for prostitution.

The fees stem from violations of the Mann Act, a federal regulation that prohibits transporting individuals for unlawful sexual exercise.

The choose’s demand for justification displays how federal courts deal with inmate appearances, particularly in high-profile circumstances involving celebrities like Diddy.

The court docket usually permits civilian clothes throughout jury trials to keep away from prejudicing jurors, however the identical leniency doesn’t at all times apply throughout sentencing.

In the meantime, Diddy’s authorized group can be pushing to overturn his conviction or safe a brand new trial.

His attorneys argue that prosecutors misapplied the Mann Act and did not show their case. They declare Diddy didn’t revenue from prostitution and solely paid escorts to carry out along with his romantic companions, which they are saying is protected by the First Modification.

In addition they argue Diddy by no means transported anybody himself and didn’t obtain cash from the encounters.

Prosecutors counter that Combs directed and generally participated within the acts, secretly recorded them with out consent and met the authorized threshold for trafficking.

Decide Subramanian heard arguments on the movement to acquit or retry the case on September 25. As of presstime, he has not but dominated on whether or not the conviction will stand or if a brand new trial will likely be granted.

Diddy has been held in custody since September 2024. His bail requests had been denied resulting from considerations about potential violence and witness tampering.

Associated