The Duchess of Sussex has spoken out about allegations claiming she took a designer gown from a high-profile photoshoot with out permission in 2022
Meghan Markle has strongly denied claims that she saved a designer gown with out permission after carrying it in a high-profile photoshoot. An nameless allegation claimed that the Duchess of Sussex didn’t ship again an emerald inexperienced Galvan Ushaia gown value at £1,293 ($1,695) following a 2022 photoshoot.
The declare resurfaced over the weekend when she seemed to be carrying the identical gown in a promotional video for her upcoming Netflix vacation particular. Netflix launched the trailer for With Love, Meghan: Vacation Celebration late final week, and the controversy across the gown rapidly adopted.
Meghan’s official spokesperson spoke on the state of affairs to the Categorical, and denied all accusations. They stated: “The insinuation that any gadgets had been taken with out the complete information and settlement of the on-set stylists or their respective groups just isn’t solely categorically false, but in addition extremely defamatory. Any gadgets saved, had been performed so in complete transparency and in accordance with contractual preparations.”
It’s believed to be a typical observe for high-profile people and members of the Royal Household to maintain clothes from photoshoots, serving to to stop the items from being resold or auctioned off with out permission afterward.
A supply defined that it’s thought of each “commonplace and prudent” for sure gadgets to be saved, stopping others from making an attempt to public sale belongings linked to stars, significantly members of the Agency, for important sums afterward.
Though Meghan and Prince Harry stepped again from their senior royal roles in 2020, they nonetheless stay members of the Royal Household. Harry continues to carry his place as fifth within the line of succession and the pair additionally retained their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles – although they aren’t allowed to make use of them for industrial achieve.
Group Sussex’s robust denial of the so-called ‘gown gate’ follows a report by the New York Submit, which repeated accusations that Meghan had “pilfered” the emerald inexperienced gown from the Selection photoshoot.
The article cited a podcast episode from March final yr, which was titled ‘Unique: Meghan Markle New Stealing Allegations’ – which claims the duchess did not return “a whole lot of stuff” from the shoot.
Throughout an look on Andrew Gold’s Heretics podcast final March, journalist Vanessa Grigoriadis revisited claims made by royal biographer Tom Bower in his 2022 e book Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the Warfare Between the Windsors. The allegations got here from a 2016 photoshoot with a Canadian clothes retailer, which occurred simply months earlier than Meghan met Harry.
She acknowledged: “Tom Bower reported that at a Reitman’s shoot, Meghan was doing the shoot and every little thing was nice. Photoshoots, the celebrities or the vital particular person isn’t alleged to take the garments that they’re truly carrying within the shoot, residence.”
Grigoriadis goes on to say that Bower claimed the group had been left “stunned” when a pair of excessive heels weren’t returned.
Ms Grigoriadis added: “I’ve since heard in a more moderen photoshoot of Meghan’s there was additionally a whole lot of stuff that was not returned after Meghan wore it in a really high-profile photoshoot.”
It’s understood that she was referencing the Selection photoshoot, throughout which Meghan wore the Galvan Ushaia inexperienced gown.
In response the podcast host was shocked, whereas the journalist famous that gadgets sometimes go lacking after photoshoots.
She added that what makes such allegations stunning is that Meghan, residing in a multimillion greenback mansion in Montecito and incomes huge offers, clearly has no have to take gadgets from photoshoots.
The podcast resurfaced after followers observed that Meghan wore one of many clothes rom the referenced photoshoot within the teaser for the third season of her Netflix present, With Love, Meghan.
Web page six additionally highlighted that Meghan appeared in the identical gown in each the unique shoot and the promotional trailers, quoting an unnamed style supply claiming that she “took the gown from the shoot with out asking”.
In celeb photoshoots, it’s normally the model’s resolution whether or not the star can maintain the clothes and different gadgets used.
Meghan’s spokesperson has confirmed that the gadgets, together with the Galvan Ushaia gown, had been saved with full approval from the related groups.
